Science Fiction Review Manual

🔧 Science Fiction Review Manual

How to Write Reviews for Hard Sci-Fi, Military Fiction, Gritty Space Dramas, and Philosophical Speculation

---

✅ At-a-Glance Checklist (Quick Review)

• ✔️ Basic book & author information

• ✔️ Concise, spoiler-minimal summary

• ✔️ Identify genre markers: hard sci-fi, military, blue-collar grit, philosophical themes

• ✔️ Analyze

  • World-building
  • Scientific realism
  • Characters
  • Moral depth

• ✔️ Use evidence (quotes, themes, scenes)

• ✔️ Evaluate both strengths and weaknesses

• ✔️ Tailor recommendation to reader audience

---

1. 📘 Book & Author Details

Include:

• Title & author

• Publisher, publication year

• Series placement (if applicable)

• Relevant background of the author (e.g., military experience, scientific expertise)

---

2. 🧭 Summary

Keep it brief (1–2 paragraphs). Focus on:

• Setting, main characters, and central conflict

• Avoid spoilers, but highlight what makes this book unique

• Clarify genre tone (e.g., cerebral vs. action-driven)

---

3. 📚 Genre & Audience Context

Help readers locate the book’s narrative DNA:

• Does it reflect working-class realism like The Expanse?

• Is it rich in philosophical speculation that ponders what it means to be human? Like Startrek: The Next Generation with the android, Data?

• Is it hard sci-fi? Focused on real or speculative science?

• Is it military sci-fi? Emphasizing tactics, ranks, or strategic dilemmas?

• What about the human aspect of story? Are there acts of greed, ideology, cowardice, or heroism?

💡 Sidebar Comparison

Series/Film/Book	⚙️ Grit	🧠 Philosophy	🔬 Science Accuracy	🪖 Military Focus	🧬 Human Dimension
The Expanse	✔️✔️✔️	✔️	✔️✔️✔️	✔️✔️	✔️✔️
Battlestar Galactica	✔️✔️	✔️✔️✔️	✔️	✔️✔️✔️	✔️✔️✔️
Firefly	✔️✔️✔️	✔️	✔️	✔️	✔️✔️✔️
Interstellar	✔️	✔️✔️✔️	✔️✔️✔️	❌	✔️✔️✔️
Blindsight	✔️✔️	✔️✔️✔️	✔️✔️✔️	✔️	✔️

---

4. 🔍 Analytical Lenses

Break down your review using these four critical lenses:

• 🌍 World-Building: Is the universe detailed, coherent, and politically/sociologically rich?

• 🧪 Science & Realism: Are technologies or tactics grounded in plausible logic?

• 👥 Characters & Themes: Are characters nuanced and reflective of broader issues (e.g., trauma, identity, loyalty)?

• 🧠 Philosophical Engagement: Does the book challenge the reader’s views on ethics, agency, AI, or existence?

---

5. 📖 Use of Evidence

Anchor your analysis with examples:

• Quote impactful dialogue or scenes

• Cite gadgets, dilemmas, or speculative elements

• Link ideas back to genre expectations and reader engagement

---

6. ⚖️ Evaluation

Be honest and balanced. Include both:

• Strengths: originality, world-building, emotional resonance, intellectual ambition

• Weaknesses: pacing issues, exposition overload, underdeveloped subplots

---

7. 🎯 Recommendation

Tailor your review to specific audiences:

• Fans of military realism or political intrigue

• Readers of philosophy-in-fiction

• Viewers of Alien, The Expanse, Gattaca, or Arrival

• Newcomers to genre fiction needing clear thematic signposts

---

8. 🧾 Sample Review Excerpts

“The aliens are more truly alien than any I’ve encountered. The novel explores radical neurodivergence in a survival context.”
— Blindsight, reviewed by Logan Trasher Collins

"Based on tonight's premiere, this mix of Star Wars and Stagecoach could prove to be visually ambitious, thematically provocative and full of crackling dialogue."
— Firefly, reviewed by Charlie McCollum

---

9. 📌 Final Quick-Reference

Before publishing or submitting, ask:

• ❓ Did I clearly identify the genre?

• ❓ Did I avoid spoilers?

• ❓ Did I back up opinions with examples?

• ❓ Did I explore key themes thoughtfully?

• ❓ Did I match my tone to the intended audience?

---

Image Credit: Escape Velocity (Rapier)